Just For The Hale Of It

Wall Street Greed? More Like Washington Folly

We heard a lot during the election season about “Wall Street greed.” With all the clamor, one could readily conclude that the market collapse, the credit crunch and everything else ailing the republic stemmed from a bunch of Wall Street moguls seeking riches by stomping on the “little guy.”

We must save Main Street from Wall Street became the cry. It’s a lie.

It’s true that investors seeking higher yields bought novel securities comprised of bundled loans made to high risk borrowers. But was that greed. . . or excessive exuberance over opportunities triggered by rising housing prices? Between 1997 and 2005 the average price of a house in the U.S. more than doubled. When the bubble burst (as bubbles always do), too many borrowers had negative equity; i.e. their mortgage balances exceeded the market value of their homes. So the system collapsed.

Instead of laying all the blame on Wall Street, let’s look at the root cause of this. It all started with the passage of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) in 1977. The idea was to foster homeownership – help people achieve the American dream. Banks were required to lend, invest and open branches in low income areas that had been written off.

Early results were promising. Devastated neighborhoods like the South Bronx were revitalized, new housing and businesses were started and essential services such as medical centers were financed. But like so many well-meaning government programs, it grew big and cumbersome; riddled with incompetence and corruption.

Around 1992, Congress began pushing the now disgraced Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to increase their purchases of mortgages going to low and moderate income borrowers. In 1995, CRA was expanded, resulting in an increase of 80% in the number of high risk bank loans. And in 1996, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) ordered that 42% of Fannie’s and Freddie’s mortgage financing go to borrowers with incomes below the median in their areas. This was increased to 50% in 2000 and to 52% in 2005.

So Fannie and Freddie funded hundreds of billions of dollars worth of loans, many of them subprime and adjustable rate, made to borrowers with less than 10% down. They also purchased hundreds of billions of subprime securities for their own portfolios.

In 1997, with a $384 million offering guaranteed by Freddie Mac, the late Bear Stearns became the first to securitize CRA loans and over the next 10 months issued $1.9 billion of CRA mortgages backed by Fannie or Freddie. From there, the party just got bigger and bigger, placing the entire U.S., and even the world, economy in jeopardy.

Meanwhile, conservative Republicans in Congress began sounding alarms, warning that Fannie and Freddie were ticking time bombs. They denounced the outrageous compensation of Fannie and Freddie executives. When they questioned the soundness of Fannie and Freddie paper, they were dismissed as cranks. Some 40 hearings were held and at least eight bills drafted, to no avail. Nobody was paying attention. Liberal Democrats like Chuck Schumer, Chris Dodd and Barack Obama, beneficiaries of generous Fannie and Freddie political contributions, praised Fannie and Freddie and its corrupt management to the hilt. Everything’s fine. Fannie and Freddie are strong and vibrant.

We all know what happened. Without Fannie and Freddie’s implicit (now real) guarantee of government support, the mortgage-backed securities market and the subprime part of it probably would not have expanded the way it did. Washington, just as much if not more than Wall Street, created the artificially high housing prices, which contributed in large measure to the mess we’re in.

FA

Who Are Fannie And Freddie?

The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) was created in 1938 (during the Great Depression) to guarantee mortgage loans made by private banks. In 1968, the government freed Fannie Mae from its control and privatized it with a “congressional charter.” It became like any other bank except, rather than make mortgage loans to the public, it bought up mortgages already made by private banks.

Two years later, 1970, to address increasing home ownership, the government created a duplicate institution: the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac).

Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been private enterprises since then – up until September 7, 2008.

E. Hale Jones
FA Editor & Publisher

Email your comments and questions about the ‘Hale Of It’ to editor@financialadvisorpublications.com



 

Please see our Privacy Policy and Legal Terms and Conditions.
Copyright © 2008 Advisor Publication Partners, Ltd. All rights reserved.